Créer mon blog M'identifier

However if you want lights that are going to provide

Le 17 août 2017, 04:13 dans Humeurs 0

However if you want lights that are going to provide a high level of illumination at night then it is worth considering installing super bright LED flood lights.Reason 6 - These types of lights release very little heat when on and so you will find that the risk of someone getting burnt when they come into contact with them is very unlikely. This is because these forms of lights don't contain any UV, IR, mercury or lead in them that when they become heated release gases that could prove harmful to one's health. So you don't have to limit yourself at installing them high up but can also be located at ground level as well.Reason 2 - Super bright LED flood lights like other forms of LED flood lights use far less energy to power them and don't create as much heat. Emergency Light Manufacturers In this article we take a look at the reasons for choosing these types of LED flood lights over some of the others. As a result you will not have to use led flood light so much energy to provide the power that will help them to create the necessary LED lights.Reason 5 - As you will learn just like other types of LED lights you will find that these ones are very eco friendly. On average the bulbs that are installed in these types of lights can last for between 60,000 and 100,000 hours. In most cases these types of lights have the ability to illuminate an area of between 150 and 300 square foot.Reason 4 - Along with these types of flood lights coming in a variety of different colors you have the ability to control this as well. So of course this in turn means that they last for much longer compared to say incandescent or fluorescent flood lights do. So of course you will not find yourself having to spend money and time on replacing the bulbs in these as often. You have the option either to control the change so that it happens gradually or very quickly. So finding the right flood lights to help enhance the look of your home or business as well as provide additional security will not prove at all difficult. You can now get flood lights where you are able to change the color if you want.LED lights have evolved over the years and are becoming more and more prominent in terms of use both in the residential and industrial sectors for lighting purposes.Reason 3 - You will find that these come in a wide array of colors as well as bright white you can get ones that emit warm white light or even red, blue or yellow light as well.Reason 7 - As Super Bright LED flood lights emit a much brighter light compared to that emitted by fluorescent or incandescent ones so you won't need to use so many..Reason 1 - These types of lights have a much wider viewing angle so this means that they illuminate a much larger area. The various benefits of LEDs have benefited the lighting industry substantially over the last few years, and the versatility of these lights have made them exceptionally useful for various lighting purposesThere are numerous types of flood lights now available for both commercial and residential use.

Let’s not forget that the Secret Service is the finest protection service in the world

Le 16 août 2017, 03:49 dans Humeurs 0

“Let’s not forget that the Secret Service is the finest protection service in the world,” Johnson said.“The Secret Service is stretched too [thin] and, in many cases, beyond its limits,” the report concludes. “The panel found an organization starved for leadership that rewards innovation and excellence and demands accountability.They also announced a series of bipartisan investigations in the new year that will explore the issues raised in the report. But in fiscal year 2013, the average agent received only forty-two hours of training, apart from firearms re-qualifications and basic career development technical requirements. “The Secret Service must commit to change. soil, Kessler argues that a former high-ranking FBI official would be an ideal choice to change the agency’s “lax management culture that has led to these problems that threaten the president’s life.”While the panel stresses the need for strong new leadership, it also says additional resources and staff should be provided as soon as possible.Earlier Thursday, Earnest said he doesn’t have a timeline for an announcement of a new permanent Secret Service director.An outside panel evaluating security breaches and cultural problems within the Secret Service recommended more training and staff, a higher fence around the White House and, most importantly, a new director from the outside who can change the agency’s insular culture. The report recommends that the agency add at least 200 positions in the Uniformed Division, which is charged with security at the White House complex, and 85 in the Presidential Protective Division, who safeguard the president and the first family when they travel.Johnson also pointedly noted that some of the panel’s recommendations are similar to others made in past agency reviews that were never implemented.“This is not something, in my judgment, based on the recommendations I’ve seen, that can change overnight,” Johnson told MSNBC Thursday. Clancy headed the agency’s presidential protection division for several years before becoming director of corporate security for Comcast.“The president does have confidence in the men and women of the Secret Service,” Earnest added.That must change if the agency is committed to reform and accountability, the panel said..”Both Johnson and White House press secretary Josh Earnest Thursday said they believe the Secret Service is doing an excellent job in keeping the president and the first family safe.The Presidential Protection Division, for instance, in years past once trained for two weeks out of eight.S. While the panel recommended a minimal increase in agents and uniformed officers, it proposed larger increases in the future.”The panel, which also interviewed 120 experts inside and outside government, earned high praise from some recent critics of the agency.Panelists include Tom Perrelli, a former associate attorney general; Mark Filip, a former deputy attorney general and former U. “They are dedicated professionals that put their lives on the line every day to protect the president, the first family and all of us.When it comes to improving the fence, the panel declined to make precise recommendations but broadly said the agency should explore some “common-sense improvements” such as increasing the height by four or five feet; eliminating horizontal bars, which make it easier to climb; and including an outward curvature at the top of the fence to make scaling it more difficult.”Earlier in an interview Thursday, Johnson said the report uncovered deep-seated problems that the agency won’t be able to fix quickly., the ranking member of the panel, issued a joint statement Thursday thanking the panel for its hard work. “Accountability creates the culture of performance that the Secret Service needs to meet its zero-failure mission. Elijah Cummings, D-Md. He placed the onus on the Secret Service and himself to ensure the reforms take place. “The need for solar street light a strong leader from outside the agency who will impose accountability being the most important.Officers in the uniformed division are working an “unsustainable number of hours,” the report found, often keeping them from much-needed training sessions. Throughout the majority of its nearly 149-year history, only once has the agency had a director from outside its ranks. The panel's criticism of the Secret Service as insular is especially important.Most of the panel’s report remains classified, but the Department of Homeland Security released an executive summary Thursday afternoon that found systemic and substantial problems with top brass at the Secret Service, an agency tasked with protecting the president, the first family, former presidents and dignitaries, as well as uncovering financial crimes.”“These are not just morale issues, or issues of fairness or trust,” they wrote.”Incoming House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, who led the charge for more scrutiny of the Secret Service over the last year, and Rep. For the Secret Service to maintain its high standards, the organization needs to be assured that managers believe in the standards and “enforce them in a consistent, evenhanded manner.“This time must be different,” he said.”“From agents to officers to supervisors, we heard a common desire: More resources would help, but what we really need is leadership,” they continue. District Court judge; Danielle Gray, a former Cabinet affairs secretary and assistant to the president; and Joseph Hagin, a former White House deputy chief of staff for operations.“Of the many concerns the panel encountered, the question of leadership is, in our view, the most important,” the panel wrote in the report.“[It] hit all the right notes,” Kessler said.S. The agency’s former director, Julia Pierson, stepped down in October after several security breaches came to light and halting testimony before Congress. Obama then appointed Joseph Clancy as acting director. Ron Kessler, the author of several books on the Secret Service, including his recently released "First Family Detail," said the report was right on the mark. “There are more fundamental, systemic issues with the Secret Service that I think need to be addressed and cannot be addressed overnight.“Any of the adjustments, the panel is certain, can be made without diminishing the aesthetic beauty or historic character of the White House grounds,” they wrote.Instead of developing better systems to more accurately reflect its staffing needs, the panel found that the agency has fallen back on giving existing employees more overtime.The panel concluded that the Secret Service needs strong, new leadership that can “drive change” within the organization.The organization has a zero-failure mission, and must constantly improve and evolve to face changing threats, the report said.“Only a director from outside the Service, removed from organizational traditions and personal relationships will be able to do the honest top-to-bottom reassessment this will require,” they wrote. Training for the Uniformed Division also has fallen to unacceptable levels, the report found.”Given the FBI’s success in thwarting attacks edsion bulb vintage on U.In releasing the report, Johnson called the recommendations “astute, thorough and fair,” and said some of the improvements at the agency have already begun.Johnson appointed the outside panel in the early fall after a number of security failures came to light, including a man jumping the White House fence and penetrating the ceremonial heart of the White House and another, and another first reported by the Washington Examiner, involving a breach of protocol when an armed security guard shared an elevator with Obama.“The investigation will examine security breaches that have recently been publicly reported, as well as focus on overall leadership, staffing, culture, protocol, technology, tactics and training issues,” they said.Another common refrain from the nearly 50 Secret Service agents and officers the panel interviewed is that the agency is too insular.

Young also pointed out that the Times has thus far made no mention of the bomb threats against Airplay

Le 9 août 2017, 09:56 dans Humeurs 0

This prompted the "neutral" panelists — consisting of the Poynter Institute's Ren LaForme, NBC San Diego's Lynn Walsh and game developer Derek Smart — to concede that there are problems in video game media. Young also pointed out that the Times has thus far made no mention of the bomb threats against Airplay.But Airplay was just one event with a small reach."The afternoon panel — consisting of American Enterprise Scholar Christina Hoff Sommers, Reason contributing editor Cathy Young and Breitbart contributor Milo Yiannopoulos — was interrupted by a bomb threat that forced an evacuation of the building. Such a site or position could help keep gaming journalists honest.He also suggested providing gaming outlets with a policy for correcting articles in a timely and accurate manner, and a policy for addressing conflicts of interest."My yet-to-be-congealed idea was to use SPJ's awards to encourage ethical games reporting.Michael Koretzky, the regional SPJ director who hosted the panels, offered some insight into what's next for the movement. "And that's how large media outlets become small ones, and small ones become large ones," Koretzky wrote.Those fighting for ethics in video game journalism — and the broader media, which has relied on video game media numerous times — should be proud that the event was able to show that GamerGate is not a harassment movement, and that ethical lapses are a problem in video game media.Ceb pointed out the conflicts of interest — without proper disclosure — permeating video game media. While thousands watched the live feed online, the event ultimately didn't reach everyone that needed to watch it..This was a great first step, but more events and panels are needed.This past weekend I traveled to beautiful Miami to discuss ethics in video game journalism — a theme popularized by the Twitter hashtag and controversy known as "GamerGate. Those involved with GamerGate have been fighting an uphill battle to get accurate representation in the media ever since. I noted the story of Max Temkin, the creator of the popular party game Cards Against Humanity, who was accused of a years-old rape on Facebook by a former college acquaintance whom he says he never had sex with, though he dated her very briefly."He added that if major gaming outlets boycotted the awards, smaller websites could win them and gain credibility.In an email, Koretzky recommended that he and SPJ create a category of journalism awards specifically for the gaming media, a proposal he first brought up during Airplay."It's a slam dunk for you guys, you got one, you have an ethical dilemma here," LaForme said. Their reports led Temkin to be branded a "rapist" and disinvited from a tech conference — all based on a Facebook accusation. Video game journalists did nothing to try and verify the story or reach out to Temkin, relying solely on the LED High Mast Lamp Facebook post and Temkin's defense on his personal blog. "This is unethical, I agree. He also floated the idea of beginning a new outlet or creating a position to report on gaming media — an ombudsman of sorts for gaming media. Among the criteria for all SPJ awards is hewing to the Code of Ethics," Koretzky wrote."We are talking about offering the gaming press some education, some training directly from SPJ and the Poynter Institute .If you would like to read more details about the event, I suggest you read Smart's excellent play-by-play.The video game media deployed the same level of journalistic integrity that led to the retraction of the now infamous Rolling Stone story about an alleged gang-rape. to help provide direct contact and support," Koretzky said during Airplay.On Saturday, at the Society for Professional Journalist's Airplay debate, I and my fellow panelists — video game and culture commentator Mark Ceb and Breitbart News contributor Allum Bokhari — noted several instances where the games media dropped the ball, ethically. "So if SPJ had a games journalism award, or even a few of them, then media outlets who want the prestige of boasting they're the best will have to obey that Code or never win."For those who just read that sentence and thought, "What the heck," GamerGate began when a handful of video game players discovered conflicts of interest between game developers and the media who review their products.Because of the negative attention foisted upon the game developer, the media — always happy to report a "war on led bulb filament women" story — ran with the narrative that people who play video games are hateful and misogynistic. Young noted that The New York Times ran a front-page story about feminist video game critic Anita Sarkeesian canceling a speech at Utah State University over death threats — allegedly from a GamerGate supporter, though no evidence exists to prove her claim.The Internet being the Internet, the game developer also received negative comments.. A gaming journalist repeatedly promoted a game developer he had been dating without disclosing the relationship. This all came to light in the ugliest way possible, when her former boyfriend detailed his grievances about the relationship.

Voir la suite ≫